Re: (suspend && lock screen) vs (lock screen && suspend)
On Thu 12 May 2022 at 17:34:55 (+0100), Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> On 12/05/2022 14:31, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 02:06:24PM +0100, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> > > #!/bin/sh
> > > systemctl suspend && mate-screensaver-command -l
> > > This one seems to work, however I would have thought that the logical
> > > sequence would be:
> > >
> > > mate-screensaver-command -l && systemctl suspend
> > >
> > > that is, a) lock screen; b) suspend; c) resume with lock screen on.
> > >
> > > Instead, if I use the latter syntax, upon resuming, there is a 10 second
> > > delay before locking the screen, which is not ideal for obvious privacy
> > > reasons.
> > >
> > > Any input on that?
> "race condition" or not, it doesn't make sense that, upon resume, the
> screen lock pauses for 10 seconds and then reactivates.
https://github.com/mate-desktop/mate-screensaver/issues/231
Cheers,
David.
Reply to: