Re: must i consider zfs or lvm for smr large drive?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: must i consider zfs or lvm for smr large drive?
From: David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:43:12 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] e8f1bdc2-78dc-8188-4677-1888f8216123@holgerdanske.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20507c50-1e28-750c-add9-90328c5f8b41@potentially-spam.de-bruyn.de>
References: <[🔎] CAJcAo8vyS=ifbBeOyenQVo2xtUxfLh-A_1RXGErXakkt4_=PMw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20507c50-1e28-750c-add9-90328c5f8b41@potentially-spam.de-bruyn.de>

On 8/19/22 17:28, DdB wrote:

If i use [ZFS] for a single drive, i would at the very least consider
setting "copies=2" to have at least some redundancy for data, i value.

My SOHO file and backup servers are FreeBSD with encrypted ZFS root. Iuse single 2.5" SSD's for the OS drive. I hacked the installer to setcopies=2 for boot and root, and enabled mirror for swap.



David

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: must i consider zfs or lvm for smr large drive?
  - From: DdB <debianlist@potentially-spam.de-bruyn.de>

References:
- must i consider zfs or lvm for smr large drive?
  - From: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
- Re: must i consider zfs or lvm for smr large drive?
  - From: DdB <debianlist@potentially-spam.de-bruyn.de>

Prev by Date: Re: must i consider zfs or lvm for smr large drive?
Next by Date: Re: debian-user-digest Digest V2022 #675
Previous by thread: Re: must i consider zfs or lvm for smr large drive?
Next by thread: Re: must i consider zfs or lvm for smr large drive?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread