On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 03:09:08PM -0600, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: [...] > > Isn't it all about X by design to not be able to safely protect a > > running X applications to snoop on other running X applications, > > something like the content of a window cannot safely kept private? I > > remember to have read that Wayland was invented for this reason, to > > overcome these security flaws of X which in the beginning of X have not > > been a concern to anyone, but nowadays security issues are of much > > importance to almost everyone. > > (I have no reference for this statement, just remember to have something > > like this read in the past) > > > > That was exactly what I asked here a few days ago. And I was told that I > was incorrect, that Wayland was simply a better implementation of X. That > the old implementation X.org was still under active development. Showing > that I was mistaken. They only removed the stuff me and you don't need. Promised ;-) Cheers -- t
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature