Re: Security
Hi.
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 09:43:18AM +0100, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 30 ian 22, 19:27:56, Reco wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > How does "people installing without recommends" translate to "GNOME
> > > users" is beyond me,
> >
> > Easy. Look closely at two graphical frontends to libvirt they provide in
> > main archive.
> > Now ask yourself - would I need these on a server? Who would need to use
> > these?
>
> Those who want a graphical tool to manage their VMs?
I.e. those who have a dozen VM at most, a single "server" to host them,
and said "server" is most probably translates to a localhost. I don't
see all that as a bad thing, but each GUI has its share of limitations
once it comes to managing something in big quantities, and both GNOME
boxes and Virt Manager follow that principle.
> Installing some -gnome packages still doesn't make me a GNOME user ;)
But installing them gives you a pile of GNOME core packages by
dependency.
Thus the software in question behaves the way GNOME developers want it
to behave, and the dependent software does it too. #768376 is a fine
example of that.
Thus I have bad news for you - installing either GNOME boxes or Virt
Manager (or other GNOME stuff) made you GNOME user, but if you insist
you're not - I won't press it ;)
For the record, for me both "GNOME" and "GNOME user" does not have a
negative connotation. About the only flaw of GNOME project for me is
their abuse of Scrum software development methodology, and that's a
topic for another discussion.
Reco
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Security
- From: Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>