ubuntu/snap future

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: "debian-user@lists.debian.org" <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: ubuntu/snap future
From: riveravaldez <riveravaldezmail@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 00:26:16 -0300
Message-id: <[🔎] CAD8U+g8h-w7KXVC=Z-XcbYcMA2O1aJpOg12mvRjL0qPBmGcKQg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 06042021124358.217e4671cbea@desktop.copernicus.org.uk>
References: <[🔎] 7892dc19-e457-09fd-428f-cbbc7dcbd2a6@gmail.com> <[🔎] CAMPM96riPJVjSS8pG06Y6AORNDeg2tShpdwUXZADLTwHeyOj+w@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 1a11bd48-2b9e-bb98-6484-9c58ba948290@le-bars.net> <[🔎] 06042021124358.217e4671cbea@desktop.copernicus.org.uk>

On Tuesday, April 6, 2021, Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue 06 Apr 2021 at 11:20:58 +0200, Yoann LE BARS wrote:
>
> I had occasion to install Zoom a few weeks ago;'snap install zoom-client'.
> Everything went smoothly and I quite like having this proprietary package
> strictly confined.

Hi, I was under the impression that (besides being fully open) Flatpack had better confinement method that Canonical's Snap, anybody knows if this is correct?

Kind regards.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ubuntu/snap future
  - From: Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org>

References:
- ubuntu/snap future
  - From: George Shuklin <george.shuklin@gmail.com>
- Re: ubuntu/snap future
  - From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursamundi.org>
- Re: ubuntu/snap future
  - From: Yoann LE BARS <yoann@le-bars.net>
- Re: ubuntu/snap future
  - From: Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Where does apt-cdrom put the release file?
Next by Date: Re: Dell R440 with Debian 10.7.0 Display Issues
Previous by thread: Re: ubuntu/snap future
Next by thread: Re: ubuntu/snap future
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread