Fwd: how to - XDMCP/LightDM - remote only
There were 4 questions and environment descriiption in the mail i sent
yesterday, but robot ate them and moderators can not help recovering
them....
Hope they still would help later, but they did not yet.
Okay, main question was, how can i setup the box so that LightDM/XDMCP
was available on TCP but was not run locally ? I do not want local X
server run on the remote headless box, and i want be able to log into
the box from remote Windows client. ssh x forwarding is practically
unusable with Mate and other DEs
---------- Forwarded message ---------
От: Arioch The <ariochthe@gmail.com>
Date: пн, 5 апр. 2021 г. в 14:09
Subject: Fwd: how to - XDMCP/LightDM - remote only
To: <linux-gate-owner@lists.bofh.it>
Hello guys. Can you recover the mail please ?
There was MUCH more text than what the robot quoted. Remembering and
restructuring and retyping all those details would be troublesome.
Google Groups do not have "Sent" folder, nothing is there in GMail's.
So, could you please approve that mail or copy its whole text for me?
---------- Forwarded message ---------
От: Moderation Robot <robomod@news.nic.it>
Date: пн, 5 апр. 2021 г. в 14:00
Subject: Re: how to - XDMCP/LightDM - remote only
To: Arioch The <ariochthe@gmail.com>
linux.debian.user is a moderated newsgroup in gateway
with a mailing list.
Your article has been examined by the automatic moderation program
and has been refused because:
this hierarchy accepts posts only from registered users.
You can register for posting by subscribing to the linux-gate@lists.bofh.it
mailing list. You can do so by sending a message with "subscribe" in the
body at the linux-gate-request@lists.bofh.it address or by visiting
http://lists.bofh.it/listinfo/linux-gate .
For more information about the linux.* hierarchy please read the FAQ
at http://www.linux.it/~md/linux-faq
Virtually your,
The Moderation Robot.
------- Follows the first few lines of your article --------
X-Google-Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:path:newsgroups:date:injection-info
:nntp-posting-host:user-agent:mime-version:message-id:subject:from
:injection-date:to:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=YKyzhIugDsiXLEQmJpNcrsZ74rQOrs+wTF4uEd7aULM=;
b=YC0UFlq/rXoX4oMJU8bu5AHdU9aJGfDlMNKdsDngGnAdmjFtfguFAv7gbYq0aTprEU
pCOJP0WY7XhzDpZeN9j69ydCv0Vcbw9mAdZlldtKL+jLcalCbi9yHbOZMEYJLijCLuRo
ZVkKB6B5h7rmlWwtcov0aC6Z1cd8MuZDyiOsByC0zSA1XesI1qewaQkjNSMRL9HCCd37
xxeH/VieEjSwgZjHh/zitc3xkp+qABovp0lhCN5IssGgyQBSCFmpRyL1PTg4VBpNxNqN
ftqJZUwo0rWUDXq3ISVaqVeewWbHHngeMmVtjf++4vVyepIzW2wWbSbUgTLFVNE0kV1M
wOsQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ECOSI2BmzY9mdUfn7XfMngD0HmUsv5yXFbj2LMO1bcGftwWU9
VYEVrSOcNEEMH3nsgDPurzML16A7GvTyYvlnd0E=
X-Google-SMTP-Source:
ABdhPJzlToRLLPNNfUYXXyFXl8JHiEFDrQjjGiPO5AK1P9+nfUToL08U42dLGdbHNB19xf+T2X7SGAsg5MkR1296jWzgre7xca13
X-Received: by 2002:a37:618e:: with SMTP id v136mr23117644qkb.151.1617619982814;
Mon, 05 Apr 2021 03:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7b49:: with SMTP id f9mr276295oto.192.1617619982433;
Mon, 05 Apr 2021 03:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: linux.debian.user
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 03:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=85.90.120.243;
posting-account=XzbdJgoAAADxgQvARoQ7vSJ-QSMwHLtl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.90.120.243
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <9b5ae47d-e443-4e43-9423-b3d22d73e9f2n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: how to - XDMCP/LightDM - remote only
From: Arioch The <ariochthe@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 10:53:02 +0000
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
Hello!=20
I am repurposing an old weak desktop for a low load family NAS (and in futu=
re maybe something more, like custom cloud, Windows Domain Server, etc).
Hardware is Intel Atom D525 on Asus ION2 mainboard, 4GB RAM.
I am newb to Linux albeit i used 2.4/2.6 on a laptop, but that was so far a=
go... in a galaxy so different than ours.
Reply to: