Re: Conflicting alternatives
On Wed 17 Feb 2021 at 11:33:11 (-0500), Dan Ritter wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> >
> > The only realistic suggestion I've read here is from tom??s,
> > who seems to be expressing some sort of shim dispatcher.
> > And I await a thought-out solution from the virtualisation crowd.
>
> I mean, that's easy, but it doesn't solve the stated problem.
> Each VM is a notional machine, and each machine has one MTA.
Yes, sorry; I was thinking about Stefan's comment about "running
two different SMTP servers on two different interfaces", which seems
to be +some+ sort of use case. Might they then be able to deliver
to the a common MDA?
> It's probably great for learning about all the MTAs, but the
> original requester desperately wants to install multiple MTAs
> on the same machine at the same time.
And the OP's use case? "For convenience when one evaluating or
learning between multiple MTAs etc."
As I first wrote, why not two machines, each one with a different
MTA, and then studying their interoperation.
Or as Greg just put it:
→
↑ ↓
←
Cheers,
David.
Reply to: