> Well, that would do the job thoughtlessly. It might backfire > spectacularly. > > If one set up a service in that way, it would eventually get a > terrible reputation. > > If, on the other hand, one spent the time to maintain those > packages properly... you could be a Debian Maintainer, and get > them into the primary repos. > > The third course, that doesn't commit you to doing that work and > doesn't expose you to that risk, is more or less as I've already > outlined. apt has an excellent reputation, I'm not sure I see why mechanizing such a process as apt does should be necessarily be bad. I'm not talking about blind nightly updates. If this is truely the best way at the moment to keep perl modules maintainable, I will try it. Thanks.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature