[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Please be respectful



On 10/24/2020 3:11 PM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
Leslie,

You clearly have a great deal to say about your personal morals and ethics

Not really, no. Certainly not by comparison to the volume of my daily work. "A great deal to say" would encompass volumes. I tyed a fe lines.

and you do not regard yourself as anybody's fool.

Hmm. I am an engineer, which means I am a professional idiot. Whether I am a fool or not, I really don't know. That is for others to say.

"Never argue with a fool on the Internet - after a couple of rounds, a dispassionate observer will not be able to tell who's who"

Perhaps. I have been doing this a very long time; far, far longer than there has been an internet, or a public one, anyway. Except when I am wrong - which happens often enough - I have rarely lost a debate in any online forum. Whether that is a good or bad thing, I don't know.

Your responses in this and other threads are neither necessarily constructive

When I give my professional advice, I submit they are always constructive. When I offer a personal opinion outside my expertise as an engineer, I see no reason why the post should be construed as constructive or otherwise. They are simply accurate to the best of my ability to make them. An opinion is an opinion. "Constructive" is not an adjective that applies in any meaningful way. I will offer and defend my opinions - nothing more or less.

nor helping other people to appreciate you more widely.

Why would I wish to be appreciated at all, let alone widely? I assure you I have absolutely no desire to win a popularity contest. I despise those who seek adulation, and I am not looking for praise. If something I say is helpful, then fine. I don't mind, but I don't want anyone to think they should be grateful. I speak the truth as my experience has led me to surmise it to be irrespective of how I might be perceived.

I would respectfully suggest that you could profitably go back and read the list archives to find examples of good and useful

In the more than 40 years I have been communicating in fora similar to this I have seen just about every communication style imaginable. It would be an absolute deception for me to try to adopt a style - probably one abhorrent to me - merely to achieve some end in which I have no interest in the first place. That is not to say my communication style is any better than anyone else's, but it is mine, and I am not about to steal, as it were, someone else's. What it would profit me totally escapes me.

communication styles that will allow you to bring your expertise to bear more usefully to every reader's benefit.

If someone wants me to be useful, they need to pay me. That is what I do for a living. This thread is not about anyone's expertise or bring useful. It is about opinions concerning being polite.

The Debian mailing list code of conduct (see below) is here to try and bring some of these things more clearly to people's attention

I have to call BS on this. No matter the putative intent, rules are almost universally created as a means of making the rule maker(s) feel important or empowered. Even in the very few cases where this is not true, virtually no rules ever succeed in producing the stated intent. Control of that nature is an illusion. Very, very few people understand enough about natural processes to produce effective rulesets where intelligence and creativity are involved. It is difficult enough with computers.

The Debian Code of Conduct (see below) is more wide ranging and applies to any and all Debian assets. In many ways, it's based on
getting the best out of how we work:

Then why is it Debian continues to go down the figurative toilet? It used to be moderately decent. Year after year after year the best attributes of the distro have been tossed in the garbage so that now it is a pile of ridiculous junk. Actually, it is in great measure because of those rules it is now almost junk. Fifteen years ago, it was a half-way decent product. I did not have to search too long to find quite a few decent features of the distro. Now I am hard pressed to find a single one that was not better in previous releases.

I respectfully suggest the Debian rules be trashed in their entirety, eliminate the bunch of egos driving the projects, and get some people who don't care about their own self-importance. The rules are not working. Rules almost never do. Point to innovation and excellence, and I will show you a rule breaker.

we're aware of the sorts of issues that can cause problems or attitudes that can alienate
people and would not wish to perpetuate these.

Please quit worrying about alienating people. Quit worrying about "feelings". This is an Operating System, not an episode of Mister Roger's Neighborhood. Above all, please quit trying to be a popular OS. Leave that to Windows or Ubuntu.

With thanks for your reading time,

All the very best, as ever,

I am truly sorry if you find this statement offensive, but I find the statements above extremely disrespectful. It is very difficult to discern tone in a medium such as this, but I am having an exceedingly hard time taking this to be anything but condescending and paternalistic, just as Debian has become. If anything at all is disrespectful, a placating, patronizing attitude is.

Now let me pause to say if your intent is not to be placating and patronizing, then I abjectly apologize. It may be you are trying to be nice or non-confrontational, but that just does not play for me, either. I am not impressed by "nice". I am impressed by intelligence, toughness, and a drive for excellence. Just by the way, I am also not impressed by insincere courtesy, although I judge yours to be sincere. It also seems a bit obsequious to me, but it is very likely I am mistaken, in which case I again apologize. If not, however, then please quit trying to handle me. It is without question polite, but it is highly disrespectful.

It is just the fact it reminds me so much of what Debian has become. At every turn, it has implemented ridiculous restrictions in order to prevent idiots from being hurt in the name of security. It starts at the login screen, and gets worse from there. I have followed the fights within the Debian development arena, and almost every time they have been poorly resolved, considering far too much personal feelings and far too little coding excellence.


Reply to: