Re: qemu - some confusions
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: qemu - some confusions
- From: kjonca@poczta.onet.pl (Kamil Jońca)
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 21:46:54 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87een814gh.fsf@alfa.kjonca>
- In-reply-to: <ANWU9-7uq-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (Dan Ritter's message of "Fri, 11 Sep 2020 21:30:01 +0200")
- References: <ANWU9-7uq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ANWU9-7uq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ANWU9-7uq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ANWU9-7uq-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> writes:
> Kamil Jo?ca wrote:
>> Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> writes:
>>
>>
>> Sorry, I do not understand.
>> If LSI 53c810 / 53c895a is not supported, how output
>> "qemu-system-x86_64 -device help" should be interpreted?
>>
>> KJ
>
> Read Reco's message.
Sorry, still does not understand that: "LSI 53c810 / 53c895a is not
supported by qemu"
Sentence: "qemu handles more cases than virt-manager" (from Reco's message) is
understandable.
KJ
--
http://stopstopnop.pl/stop_stopnop.pl_o_nas.html
Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and
car keys to teenage boys.
-- P. J. O'Rourke
Reply to: