Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ...

To: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ...
From: David <bouncingcats@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:48:54 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] CAMPXz=r28u3rOeiE149JfkPhMhZ0Nhb+28TK9XYv1YwMiWacQQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 596e00de-2e72-4a08-342a-021a29ff1f85@holgerdanske.com>
References: <[🔎] 202009081253.00223.rhkramer@gmail.com> <[🔎] 202009081256.14661.rhkramer@gmail.com> <[🔎] 41cee973-ca8c-a7f9-c830-932775c35a6a@holgerdanske.com> <[🔎] 202009081743.21057.rhkramer@gmail.com> <[🔎] 20200909150343.GC5266@axis.corp> <[🔎] 46d3f447-94dc-e6fc-e7a0-811c32cedd81@holgerdanske.com> <[🔎] CAMPXz=q6RXT3b1iZTiGep82w2TC+ntek6CGtyOQywHsPm23Y-A@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 596e00de-2e72-4a08-342a-021a29ff1f85@holgerdanske.com>

On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 09:15, David Christensen
<dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> wrote:
> On 2020-09-09 23:02, David wrote:

> > parted /dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST3300622AS_******** 'unit compact print
> > free unit s print free unit b print free'

> That parted(8) incantation has issues

It works for me, but then again my disks are neither broken nor GPT.

Reply to:

References:
- Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ...
  - From: rhkramer@gmail.com
- Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ...
  - From: rhkramer@gmail.com
- Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ...
  - From: David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com>
- Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ...
  - From: rhkramer@gmail.com
- Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ...
  - From: David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk>
- Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ...
  - From: David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com>
- Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ...
  - From: David <bouncingcats@gmail.com>
- Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ...
  - From: David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ...
Next by Date: Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ...
Previous by thread: Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ...
Next by thread: Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread