[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Firefox non-ESR update needed



On Tuesday 07 July 2020 11:32:04 David Wright wrote:

> On Tue 07 Jul 2020 at 10:06:08 (-0400), rhkramer@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 07, 2020 09:57:54 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > If you are the kind of person who MUST HAVE THE LATEST THING, then
> > > Debian is not meant for you.
> >
> > Wow, not sure what sparked that response,
>
> Probably the fact that there have been a lot of postings about testing
> recently, which seem to think testing is whatever they want it to be.
> For example, the thread on testing's imaginary "security policy".
>
> > but I will say one thing, you might
> > run testing if your bank insists you have the latest thing
> > (browser).
>
> Yeh, right. Use the suite that's lacking a security policy to carry
> out all your financial transactions. ?
>
> Cheers,
> David.

I'd tend to look at it like this: If the banks IT people think its a big 
enough risk to use the old version, and demands the new one even before 
the paint is dry, then it must be pretty serious and the distros should 
turn up the heat to get it out into the users hands asap. Not sit on it 
till the next release a year hence as seems to happen now, using the 
excuse that it is a new feature and that has to wait for the next 
chapter of the release cycle.

Unfortunately, the public is now so used to some so-called expert crying 
wolf when its a mongrel puppy, that they've gone to the dark side and 
are no longer making that noise in hopes the black hats will be slowed 
in exploiting the newly found vulnerability. So we are left in the 
dark. 'scuse me?

So we the users, are damned if we do, and damned if we don't.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>


Reply to: