Re: [OT] Regular DKIM issues on this ML (was: Re: why !oh why Debian and application list)
Hi.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:06:08PM +0200, l0f4r0@tuta.io wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 13 juin 2020 à 21:14 de recoverym4n@enotuniq.net:
>
> > You're looking at the wrong header. It's X-Spam-Status and
> > X-Amavis-Spam-Status you should worry about. Authetication-Results is
> > set by your MTA receiving your own mail from the list.
> >
> > But yes, they are both OK for this and your previous e-mails.
> >
> Ok, thanks but still confusing...
Let's try it one more time. This particular phrase failed DKIM test in
another thread.
>From Linux kernel POV, *asynchronous* I/O is a pair of
io_submit/io_getevents syscalls, and dd does not do these regardless of
the options that are provided.
Reco
Reply to: