Re: [OT] Regular DKIM issues on this ML (was: Re: why !oh why Debian and application list)
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 09:28:11PM +0200, l0f4r0@tuta.io wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 16 juin 2020 14:50 de recoverym4n@enotuniq.net:
>
> > And *now* it gets interesting. Because what's came to the list was text:
> >
> > Message-ID: <[🔎] M9j2pgk--3-2@tuta.io>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> Can we imagine that the ML simply 64-decodes the email and resent it as text/plain?
That's possible. But the e-mail in question was also DKIM-signed
(including the body), so such transformation would lead to DKIM failure.
And it did not happen.
Reco
Reply to: