On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 01:29:47PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
> tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 06:59:29PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>
> >>> Debian's decisions on apache layout were made years earlier.
> >>>
> >>> Extra configuration for apache2 should be put in conf.d
>
> >> Hmmm, seems contradictory here.
> >>
> >> You say extra apache2 configuration should be placed on `conf.d`,
> >>
> >> but Debian layout use `sites-{available,enabled}` and
> >>
> >> `conf-{available,enabled}`. Do you mean upstream layout or something else?
>
> > Conf.d is for configuration which isn't per-site or per-module.
>
> Are you sure?
>
> I don't see anything including conf.d in a current Apache2 configuration
> on Buster.
[...]
You're probably right.
Cheers
-- t
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature