On Mi, 12 feb 20, 09:08:26, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 03:01:52PM +0100, Klaus Singvogel wrote: > > kaye n wrote: > > > *For the future, you could paste the (relevant part from) the output of > > > 'parted -l'.* > > > Just curious, never encountered that command before. > > > kaye@laptop:~$ parted -l > > > bash: parted: command not found > > > > You can install it then: "sudo apt-get install parted" > > But I prefer output of "lsblk"; but this is only a matter of taste. > > lsblk is nice because it doesn't seem to require root. In particular 'lsblk -f', especially since output of 'mount' is cluttered with lots of other file systems that are not relevant when looking at storage. > fdisk -l is another choice (requires root, though). > > fdisk was *the* go-to command a few decades back, but it was discouraged > for a while because it was slow to adopt GPT support. Current versions > of fdisk support GPT disk partitioning, so it's back on the acceptable > list. The advantage of 'parted -l' vs. 'fdisk -l' (especially in this situation) is that it also shows if the partition has a file system and what type. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature