Re: Reply to a message in the Web presentation.

[peter@easthope.ca]

Andrei,

Now we can see the result of the test.  

Messages
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/02/msg00416.html
and
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/02/msg00420.html
both thread back to your reply which threads back to my original 
message.  They have the same References.  416 was issued with an 
In-Reply-To field; 420 was issued without In-Reply-To.

So, for a 2nd reply at least, the list software maintains the thread 
without In-Reply-To.  Consistent with casual observations a few years 
back.

We might hypothesize a problem in a later generation. Then do further 
tests or study the source.  =8~(  At present I'm not so eager.

This is a nice example of "Less is More".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimalism_(computing)

Thanks for challenging my claim.  Without your reply I probably 
wouldn't have made the test.

Regards,               ... P.
               



-- 
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Medical_Machines
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Oberon
Tel: +1 604 670 0140            Bcc: peter at easthope. ca