[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: systemdq



On Sunday 29 December 2019 17:19:06 tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 05:11:18PM -0500, chris wrote:
> > There's nothing wrong with not being a fan of systemd.
>
> Absolutely not. Myself, I'm not a fan either.
>
> > It's good to let people know there's a active community that isn't
> > overly impressed [...]
>
> But what I definitely don't like either is this dramatization.
>
> My wish would be that we, the non-fans and the fans of systemd
> work together in peace. That's all.
>
> Cheers
> -- tomás

Unforch Tomas, we are not likely to see any progress toward acceptance of 
systemd until some means of eliciting a meaningfull error message from 
it comes into existence. LP must lay awake nights thinking up ways to 
makes its output totally unrelated to whats wrong.

Chasing us off from asking raspbian related questions here, is a lost 
cause because they don't have a mailing list, but a forum generally 
populated by uppity folks, who when you think you are about to get an 
answer to your problem, decide to declare the conversation has drifted 
off topic and refuse to further participate in the discussion, leaving 
you hanging for a real answer.  So while we do take our questions there, 
we are forced, language barrier, whatever, to come back here, starting 
yet another new thread in hopes we will get a usable answer.

I don't like it, helpfull folks like you don't like it. But thats how it 
actually works.

Thanks Tomas.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>


Reply to: