[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Google security



On Lu, 09 dec 19, 14:28:39, John Hasler wrote:
>  Nicholas Geovanis writes:
> > You are safe (now) so others' freedoms need not be respected. Your
> > first jump down the slippery slope :-) Jefferson the slave-master
> > would have said that you have taken one hand off the wolf's ears.
> > Good luck :-) don't let go the other ear or you become the slave this
> > time......
> 
> You clearly didn't read the rest of what I wrote.  Attempting to use
> technical measures to prevent NSA from analyzing the packets I send off
> to Web sites should they choose to do so is hopeless.  The correct
> approach to that problem is through the political process (limit their
> budget).  However, they do not pose an immediate threat of injury.
> Criminals do.  Concentrate technical efforts on the latter threat, where
> they have some hope of working.  Concentrate political efforts on the
> former.

"Criminals" are what the law defines them to be. Laws can be created and 
/ or changed as needed.

Kind regards,
Andrei (still remembering a regime where listening to the "wrong" radio 
station could get one in trouble).
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: