[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Difference between ipp, ipps, http, https CUPS protocols?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Brian wrote:
> On Wed 13 Nov 2019 at 13:55:57 -0000, Dan Purgert wrote:
>> You asked about the "classic" printers we both (apparently) own.  Mine
>> here still support being addressed via LPR/LPD, not to mention PCL,
>> postscript, etc.
>
> I wish I hadn't been so disparaging about about LPRng. People should be
> able to use what they want to use, and, if LPRng fits, why not? OTOH,
> it is unable to do what a modern CUPS system can do and does not offer
> what many users want, particularly when it comes to easy setup.

Sure, CUPS does make it comparatively easy for "Joe Average" ... I've
found things to be about on-par when you're talking about small offices
though; where the print-jobs are pretty boring/standard (all text, all
b&w, all 2-sided, etc.). 

LPR/LPD needs a little extra setup at first, but then "just runs".

CUPS doesn't take as long to setup, but does require an hour or two
every few months to keep behaving ... but then again, those two sites
are also the busiest in terms of printing; so maybe that plays into it.

> [...]
> I wonder how many modern printers support the lpd protocol?

How do we define "modern"?  Just looked at a few Brother MFPs, and they
still support it (although I don't know how old the actual models are).

Sorting by "newest" on their (laser / color led) models listing results
in the "HL-L3270CDW" being listed as "newest" -- digging around, it
seems that it's a 2018 model.  Still has LPR/LPD listed under the
"Protocols" sections (both IPv4 and v6, actually).

I would expect that pretty much everything of theirs (well, at least in
terms of "business lineup") would then still support it. Their site
seems a bit broken right now (or perhaps it's on my end), so I can't get
at the 'home' stuff to check.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAl3NNqQACgkQjhHd8xJ5
ooFV/wgApp1tfpxTB72w7No1dB5MingRVBUEd9plnNK8C4CoatqB+6c5KrEpmNvP
8cTORVpQnuge0iAVaKM5fe0ektIzmBHW23jkQDJ4pKCnia2m7sXBrhcYa8LUCXxR
M0E11be7gh1QjCqMPTO6vUJdZttRhqZo/ADFUopvkxe1D6sLSN5KM7QkUu/QLjcv
zQL2ioBMpt6cein4Tize0uPB/9foT5a5PHjdA9t20ydqmjwfXVH6zvX4EFCZtKuE
+qBDmCvJRupp5i30WiX5PegF+jw6dWL8n/Wa6NpW/rV1QVkWQtmeWpQplfCg69Gu
O/Ps7YDvbeoQkfoa+5mzQIn28BGQ7g==
=FLXF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
|_|O|_| 
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5  4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281


Reply to: