Re: Difference between ipp, ipps, http, https CUPS protocols?
On Tue 12 Nov 2019 at 11:30:33 -0000, Dan Purgert wrote:
> I believe the newest printers offer a way to print "driverless" via IPP
"Newest" encompasses the past 5-10 years.
> as well -- that is, rather than needing a device-specific PPD, the use
> of IPP lets you just send a standardized "printing format" (PDF, PCL,
> something like that), and that "printing format" plus the options you
PDLS are PDF, Apple Raster and PWG Raster. pclm too (but that is not
PCL).
> told it via the control channel gets you a nice document. Though, that
> might just be vaporware at the moment.
Vaporware? Are you aware of the effort put in by upstream CUPS and
cups-filters to support modern printers? Driverless printing is a
reality now and is the future.
--
Brian.
Reply to:
- References:
- Difference between ipp, ipps, http, https CUPS protocols?
- From: Kent West <westk@acu.edu>
- Re: Difference between ipp, ipps, http, https CUPS protocols?
- From: Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>
- Re: Difference between ipp, ipps, http, https CUPS protocols?
- From: Kent West <westk@acu.edu>
- Re: Difference between ipp, ipps, http, https CUPS protocols?
- From: Kent West <westk@acu.edu>
- Re: Difference between ipp, ipps, http, https CUPS protocols?
- From: Kent West <westk@acu.edu>
- Re: Difference between ipp, ipps, http, https CUPS protocols?
- From: Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net>