[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lsb_release -a output and debian 10.1




On 09/09/2019 09:38, Reco wrote:
> 	Hi.
> 
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 09:07:36AM +0100, Paul Sutton wrote:
>> After updating from 10.0 to 10.0 should lsb_release -a report me using
>> 10.1?
>>
>> I have run apt update then apt upgrade and updated quite a few packages,
>> but lsb_release -a still reports 10
>>
>> lsb_release -a
>> No LSB modules are available.
>> Distributor ID:	Debian
>> Description:	Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
>> Release:	10
>> Codename:	buster
>>
>>
>> Am I missing something in the update process ?
> 
> Yes you do, as it should not reflect point release version anymore.
> /usr/share/doc/base-files/changelog.gz says:
> 
> base-files (10.3+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
> 
>   * Change /etc/debian_version to 10.1, for Debian 10.1 point release.
> 
>  -- Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>  Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:31:26 +0200
> 
> ...
> 
> base-files (10.2) unstable; urgency=medium
> 
>   * Release candidate for buster as stable:
>   - Use "10" as version in /etc/issue and /etc/issue.net.
>     (never expected to change after buster is released)
>   - Use 10.0 as version in /etc/debian_version.
>     (expected to change at every point release)
>   - Change PRETTY_NAME in /usr/lib/os-release, adding 10 as version number
>     and "(buster)" as codename. Add also VERSION_ID and VERSION.
>     (never expected to change)
> ...
> 
>  -- Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>  Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:05:00 +0200
> 
> 
> So, "cat /etc/debian_version" will show you the release version for
> real, and you might as well uninstall this useless "lsb_release" thing -
> Debian is not LSB-conformant anymore anyway.
> 
> Reco
> 

Hi

Thanks for this,  and I can confirm that cat /etc/debian_version shows 10.1.

Paul


-- 
Paul Sutton
http://www.zleap.net
https://www.linkedin.com/in/zleap/
gnupg : 7D6D B682 F351 8D08 1893  1E16 F086 5537 D066 302D


Reply to: