Re: usr merge apparently breaks amanda
On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 13:12 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 06 September 2019 11:52:15 Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>
> > Le 06/09/2019 à 16:39, Gene Heskett a écrit :
> > > On Friday 06 September 2019 10:20:14 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > >> I could very easily see amanda itself breaking from usrmerge, if
> it
> > >> contains programs that try to invoke commands using their full
> > >> paths (e.g. /bin/rm -f ...).
> >
> > Why would that break ? Old paths are still valid, this is the
> purpose
> > of the symlinks.
> >
> > Before usr merge :
> > /bin/rm -> ok
> > /usr/bin/rm -> ko
> >
> > After usr merge :
> > /bin/rm -> ok
> > /usr/bin/rm -> ok
> >
> > Unless something is unable to follow symlinks.
> >
> > > FAILURE DUMP SUMMARY:
> > > picnc / lev 0 FAILED [data timeout]
> > > picnc / lev 0 FAILED [[request failed: No route to host]]
> > > picnc / lev 0 FAILED [dumper TRYAGAIN: [request failed: No
> route
> > > to host]]
> >
> > This is a network error (ARP or NDP address resolution failure). I
> > wonder what it has to do with usr merge.
>
> Good question. Network is working fine on that machine, until amanda
> touches it. Amanda's own logs on that machine look normal.
>
> And I am running out of hair. Ideas to check next appreciated.
Is the problem being talked about here different to amanda usr-merge
bug 939411 [1] which I saw that mentioned in another thread [2] ?
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939411
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2019/09/msg00219.html
--
Tixy
Reply to: