[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PROGRESS!! - was {Re: Wireless home LAN - WiFi vs Bluetooth?}



On Ma, 06 aug 19, 08:34:20, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 06 Aug 2019 at 08:44:41 (+0300), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Lu, 05 aug 19, 14:55:11, David Wright wrote:
> > > 
> > > I think it's made clear in the tomás quotation, about 18 lines above
> > > Richard's citation of the same. Regardless, the OP is connecting two
> > > machines (requiring firmware) running DEs on stretch, and has an
> > > 8-port switch lying around too, so not much chance of needing to
> > > chop up cables (unless in frustration at having to use them at all).
> > > No progress reported yet, though, AFAICT.
> > 
> > Maybe it's just me, but it was quite clear the OP excluded ethernet and 
> > the cable lying around was USB-to-USB.
> 
> We live in hope. The OP may realise eventually that the USB-to-USB is
> a dead end, a useful dead end in its day, like Kermit over RS232 which
> gave me years of service in the 1980s and 1990s. It was 2013 when I
> finally disposed of my 9/25-pin to 9/25-pin serial crossover cable.
> It could have been very useful for the OP's Kaypro 10. Yes, they have
> one of these lying around, but no room for Cat5 cables to any of their
> other computers. So our hope is forlorn. Or should I say, we are a
> forlorn hope.

Regardless, it still make the entire "to crossover or not to crossover" 
pointless.

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: