Re: session trunking with NFS

To: Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: session trunking with NFS
From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 08:09:48 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 0d4e50c6-7939-11e8-9b6a-00163eeb5320@msgid.mathom.us>
Mail-followup-to: Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com>, debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20180626070728.axntkfpjakzefmcr@i5378.home>
References: <[🔎] trinity-ad0a244d-3df6-448e-b5bc-fd8398165443-1529996245374@3c-app-gmx-bs36> <[🔎] 20180626070728.axntkfpjakzefmcr@i5378.home>

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:07:28AM +0300, Reco wrote:

Personally I'd rather use conventional network bonding on NFS server,
and be done with it.

Conventional network bonding doesn't speed up a single stream, which iswhy people have been looking for alternatives.


Mike Stone

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: session trunking with NFS
  - From: Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com>

References:
- session trunking with NFS
  - From: "Stefan Krueger" <Shadow_7@gmx.net>
- Re: session trunking with NFS
  - From: Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Help need in a Debian Based Project
Next by Date: Re: session trunking with NFS
Previous by thread: Re: session trunking with NFS
Next by thread: Re: session trunking with NFS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread