Re: utf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 02:56:47PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> tomas@tuxteam.de (2018-04-05):
> > But then when I see people proposing XML as structured data
> > representation, I suddenly grow very sad...
>
> Isn't it?
For the last 6 years I've seen it done a lot, and yes, I speak
of painful experience.
XML is a baroque, but passable document serialization language.
But (mis-)using it as a data serialization language must be one
of the worst (and ugliest) misunderstandings IT has had the last
20 years.
Cheers
- -- t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlrGHfEACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZLOgCdHbxd3ACh+/5BSLAPtijkkZra
UaUAn2nkEXU74FXWntUunIwzAFAL6VwJ
=FkWM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: utf
- From: deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com>
- Re: utf
- From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>