[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Replace systemd



> > >> Too many critical bugs found in them and treated by the upstream
> > >> developpers with only contempt for the people reporting them
> > >> (see
> > >> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6237#issuecomment-312458445)
> > > 
> > > By that logic (in)famous libc bug 4980 shoud've stopped by from
> > > using
> > > any sane Linux distribution 10 years ago. Did it?
> > >
> > Most important is not the presence of bugs. It is the way people in
> > charge deal with them.
> 
> My point exactly. #4980 is the reason they call Ulrich Drepper 'Stop
> Reopening'. But also, #4980 was fixed.
> Just the same as #6237 will be fixed in a sane way. At least that's the
> fine folks on oss-security are promising right now.

I believe archives should contain this.

Systemd bug 6237 aka CVE-2017-1000082 was fixed on Jul 6 2017 by
upstream commit bb28e68477a3a39796e4999a6cbc6ac6345a9159 in a sane way.
Just as predicted.

This change was included in recently released systemd v234.

Reco


Reply to: