Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable
Jimmy Johnson writes:
> From what I read, very serious bugs are likely to be caught before
> making it to Testing, while Unstable benefits from getting security
> updates (in the form of new upstream releases) sooner, and is more
> likely to be consistent during transitions.
Unstable is not required to be consistent at all.
That said, I've always used it on my desktop and have not had a problem
for at least ten years. However, I use FVWM rather than a desktop
environment.
--
John Hasler
jhasler@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Reply to: