Re: installer defaults for desktops (was Re: Suggested edit)
> On Mar 23, 2017, at 6:44 PM, Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thursday 23 March 2017 22:18:53 Catherine Gramze wrote:
>>> Mar 23, 2017, at 2:46 PM, Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> This is of course incorrect. But I doubt that I could refute it without
>>> appearing aggressive again. :-(
>>
>> What part of what I said is incorrect?
>
> Practically all of it.
If any part of it was actually incorrect, you could and would have pointed it out.
You just disagree with my opinion, on the basis of what *you* want Debian to be, as opposed to the stated principles of Debian. You are perfectly free to disagree, but do not make a false claim that what I say is incorrect when it is not. The netinst installer acts in an illogical way that can and does result in unintended base system only installations. My opinion is that this can and should be fixed.
Reply to: