Re: Suitable text editor [NOT word processor] or workaround?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Suitable text editor [NOT word processor] or workaround?
From: John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:38:32 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87h92tuqgn.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>
Reply-to: jhasler@newsguy.com (John Hasler)
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 201703161001.19275.rhkramer@gmail.com> (rhkramer@gmail.com's message of "Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:01:19 -0400")
References: <[🔎] 582ba29e-e812-e378-1a9c-69d1fac897dc@cloud85.net> <[🔎] 941961db-80df-3060-64f0-1696581f1467@cloud85.net> <[🔎] 20170316134731.GB5464@tuxteam.de> <[🔎] 201703161001.19275.rhkramer@gmail.com>

rhkramer writes (about Emacs):
> That was on the order of 15 years ago.  Problems that I can remember
> centered around fonts, font sizes, readability...

None of those would be problems now.
-- 
John Hasler 
jhasler@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA

Reply to:

References:
- Suitable text editor [NOT word processor] or workaround?
  - From: Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net>
- Re: Suitable text editor [NOT word processor] or workaround?
  - From: Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net>
- Re: Suitable text editor [NOT word processor] or workaround?
  - From: <tomas@tuxteam.de>
- Re: Suitable text editor [NOT word processor] or workaround?
  - From: rhkramer@gmail.com

Prev by Date: Re: Suggested edit
Next by Date: Re: Suitable text editor [NOT word processor] or workaround?
Previous by thread: Re: Suitable text editor [NOT word processor] or workaround?
Next by thread: Re: Suitable text editor [NOT word processor] or workaround?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread