Re: Do have programs have poor documentation? (was ... Re: Why? -- "A Modest Proposal")

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Do have programs have poor documentation? (was ... Re: Why? -- "A Modest Proposal")
From: Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 12:00:21 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 201701011200.21641.lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] fd1d6e0efd86eef4b00138eab3dcc768@xenhideout.nl>
References: <b3443110-fc1c-40cb-90c5-8f8df9e3b2e6@googlegroups.com> <201612310930.58327.lisi.reisz@gmail.com> <[🔎] fd1d6e0efd86eef4b00138eab3dcc768@xenhideout.nl>

On Sunday 01 January 2017 11:52:20 Xen wrote:
> Lisi Reisz schreef op 31-12-2016 10:30:
> > Which make me bad at writing?
> >
> > Lisi
>
> Refusing to write good documentation on purpose.

"%(&_++**!&

Lisi

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do have programs have poor documentation? (was ... Re: Why? -- "A Modest Proposal")
  - From: Xen <list@xenhideout.nl>

References:
- Re: Do have programs have poor documentation? (was ... Re: Why? -- "A Modest Proposal")
  - From: Xen <list@xenhideout.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: Do have programs have poor documentation? (was ... Re: Why? -- "A Modest Proposal")
Next by Date: Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level
Previous by thread: Re: Do have programs have poor documentation? (was ... Re: Why? -- "A Modest Proposal")
Next by thread: Re: Do have programs have poor documentation? (was ... Re: Why? -- "A Modest Proposal")
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread