Re: parted is ALMOST suitable
Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> writes:
> On Wed 09 Nov 2016 at 11:27:11 +0100, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 10:12:13AM +0000, Brian wrote:
>> >
>> > That gives "-bash: /dev/sda2: Permission denied" for me with a fixed
>> > disk. It's the same for a removable disk. The system came like that.
>>
>> Hopefully. But that's not because bash checks that (as parted is).
>> It's because the permissions on the device file are set right!
>
> udev doesn't come into the picture for removable disks? It did on
> pre-Jessie.
What is the relevance of udev here? Yes, udev sets the permissions, but
the issue is whether they're right not who sets them.
Reply to: