[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists



On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 08:18:17 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:25:02PM +0000, davidson@freevolt.org wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Brian wrote:
> > >Wheezy is an unsupported distribution, just like hamm, etch, potato etc.
> > >Irrespective of whether it was thought to be wonderful in its day it is
> > >now moribund apart from LTS.
> > 
> > We seem to have different understandings of what LTS stands for.
> > 
> > Interesting.
> 
> At least remember what the "S" stands for (Brian).

Noted. Also note that support from all those Wheezy users here wasn't
exactly rampant.

> There are plenty of people still running wheezy, and there will be for
> many years to come (long after wheezy LTS is discontinued).  If you don't
> wish to support it, that's fine -- you can simply not reply.

The last bit is excellent advice; I wish someone had been around at the
time to advise me. :) 

I've stopped thinking about Lenny and Potato, too.

-- 
Brian.


Reply to: