[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: parted is ALMOST suitable



On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 04:09:24PM +0000, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 09:27:47 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> 
> > On 11/7/2016 8:19 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> > >
> > >I don't see this behaviour
> > >
> > >~$ lsblk -fr
> > >NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID MOUNTPOINT
> > >sda
> > >sda1 ext2  ... /boot
> > >sda2 ext4  ... /
> > >sda3 ext2  ... /tmp
> > >etc etc etc
> > >
> > >or
> > >
> > >file -s /dev/sda{1..5} | awk '{print $5}'
> > 
> > richard@full-jessier:~$ lsblk -fr
> > NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID MOUNTPOINT
> > sda
> > sda1
> > sda2
> > sda5
> > sda6
> > sda7
> > sda8    [SWAP]
> > sda9    /
> > sda10
> > sda11
> > sda12
> > sdb
> > sdb1
> > sr0
> 
> I get the same as you on Debian 8.6. On unstable the command 'lsblk -f'
> shows all the fields populated. I wonder what Felipe Salvador is using?

~$ apt-show-versions util-linux
util-linux:amd64/testing 2.28.2-1 uptodate

~$ cat /etc/debian_version
stretch/sid


-- 
Felipe Salvador


Reply to: