Re: resolvconf troubles
On Fri 28 Oct 2016 at 16:10:31 +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 02:51:56PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Fri 28 Oct 2016 at 14:07:39 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >
> > > On Friday 28 October 2016 10:19:16 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > This was back in the day when removing it took half the system with it.
> > >
> > > ... and Gene was using Ubuntu??? ;-)
> > >
> > > I have never, over many years, had any trouble removing N-M, which for years
> > > I did automatically at installation time.
> >
> > On the whole I would never argue about what a user chose to have on his
> > or her machine for networking. My own preference is for ifupdown or
> > connman, However, the many thousands of happy users of N-M are highly
> > likely to ignore advice to remove it based on some dim recollection from
> > ten years ago.
>
> Hm. I didn't take any of the mails in this thread as advising any of
> the "many thousands of happy users of N-M" to remove anything.
>
> Whatever floats your boat.
This is not a quote from a private mail:
> At high risk of starting another flame war about network-manager, nuke
> that puppy with extreme prejudice.
--
Brian
Reply to: