[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: comparing password managers in Debian, synchronizing on multiple devices




On 24/10/16 13:05, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> 
> 
> There have been various discussions in here and in some derivative
> projects like Ubuntu about choosing and using password managers,
> especially the way to sync their password lists across multiple devices.
> 
> Given the way we do things in Debian it is important not to depend on a
> service like Dropbox to sync the password files.
> 
> Therefore, how are people choosing a password manager and solving this
> in practice?
> 
> - which password managers have a built-in mechanism for synchronizing or
> merging password lists on multiple devices?
> 
> - who is using some other mechanism such as Git or ownCloud to sync?
> 
> I've made a list of some of the password managers in Debian:
> 
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/a/assword.html
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/password-gorilla.html
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/password-store.html
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/r/revelation.html
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/k/keepass2.html
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/k/keepassx.html
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kedpm.html
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fpm2.html
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cpm.html
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/passwordsafe.html
> 
> There are quite a few and so it is hard for somebody to know the best
> place to start, maybe a comparison table in the wiki will be needed.

Wiki now created:

https://wiki.debian.org/PasswordManagement


> 
> Some other factors that come to mind for a comparison table:
> 
> - support for PGP
> - support for other strong crypto (e.g. smartcard)
> - merging algorithm for multiple devices
> - multi-user / team capabilities
> - browser integration
> 
> I notice that Tails chose to include KeePassX, although there is some
> uncertainty how it was selected:
> 
> https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/9231
> 
> Can anybody comment on its history there?
> 


Reply to: