Re: catastrophe - but how? Aptitude goes mad
On 2016-07-01, Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> That's not what I meant. I meant ask *him* *here* in this public thread why ...
>> etc.
>
> He is a subscriber to -user. By definition he *has been* asked here in
> this public thread.
Well, there you go then, man. Maybe he's formulating a thorough reply at
this very moment. Of course, rather than asking him directly in the
relevant article in which he wrote the suggestion that inspires your
undying curiosity, you chose a more tortuous route that might permit him
to ignore you under the pretext he hasn't read every single post in the
thread without exception and missed the one in question.
Or perhaps he simply thinks your interrogation doesn't merit a response
for whatever reason!
>> I thought that was clear.
>
> I hope the above is clear. Whether he chooses to reply is up to him. You
> obviously have no reply of any consequence to give.
>
Oh, geez, you're gonna hurt my feelings now, B.
--
Même l’avenir n’est plus ce qu’il était.
Paul Valéry
Reply to: