Re: catastrophe - but how? Aptitude goes mad
On Fri 01 Jul 2016 at 16:57:02 +0000, Curt wrote:
> On 2016-07-01, Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Friday 01 July 2016 17:39:57 Curt wrote:
> >>
> > Because then the answer might be private too, and this is a public thread. I
> > would obviously be interested in the answer, and many others might be too.
> > Not to mention that it would be useful for the archives and that Henrique
> > might not want to be bothered privately.
>
> That's not what I meant. I meant ask *him* *here* in this public thread why ...
> etc.
He is a subscriber to -user. By definition he *has been* asked here in
this public thread.
> I thought that was clear.
I hope the above is clear. Whether he chooses to reply is up to him. You
obviously have no reply of any consequence to give.
Reply to: