[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: theme editor?



On 2015-02-10, Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 03:04:44 AM Petter Adsen wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 02:44:13 -0500
>> 
>> Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> wrote:
>> > On Monday, February 09, 2015 11:01:10 PM David Wright wrote:
>> > > Quoting Gene Heskett (gheskett@wdtv.com):
>> > > [...]
>> > > 
>> > > > dm-tool sounds like something I should look at, but it is not in
>> > > > the repo's I address. Fixable?
>> > > > 
>> > > > Thanks Petter.
>> > > 
>> > > I don't understand this. Earlier in the thread you posted:
>> > > >>Greetings;
>> > > >>
>> > > >>I am apparently using lightdm and I have failed to find a desktop
>> > > >>theme which is 100% pleasing. So I am wondering if we have a
>> > > >>theme editor that might allow me to tweak some colors here and
>> > > >>there in an existing theme?
>> > > 

[SNIP}

> The problem isn't one I cannot live with if I chose the correct theme, but 
> when running kmail under this window manager, 99% of them use so faint a 
> marker in the folder list to indicate which folder you are in that it 
> needs a concentrated stare to spot it, and if the msg list is aggregated 
> other than flat-by-date, there is so much of the same garish colors there 
> that I am unable to read the subject line of the currently displayed 
> message, the color totally overrides the textual content.
>
> What I was hoping I could do was to make some minor edits in the best of 
> the lot to see if it could be further improved.
>
> From the proliferation of available themes available, one would draw the 
> conclusion that there is an editor used by the producers of all these.
>
> Looks like a false hope at this time & repo selection.
>  
> Thanks Petter.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett

Are you trying to configure the display manager theme or the themes used
by applications such as kmail after you login? If the latter, then
lightdm has nothing to do with it.

-- 

Liam



Reply to: