[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: About Testing Freeze and KDE



Le 9 déc. 2014 à 23:49, Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> a écrit :

> On 2014-12-09, B. M. <b-misc@gmx.ch> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I'm using Debian since about a year now, so this is my first freeze
>> :-)
>> 
>> How does the freeze work in regard to KDE: currently, many packages
>> are at 4.14.2, PIM is at 4.14.1 and the latest 4.14 release is 4.14.3
>> 
>> Is it true that the packages will stay at these version numbers, also
>> after the release of Jessie? But wouldn't it make sense to upgrade
>> everything to 4.14.3 since this is the latest and most stable KDE 4
>> release? Is this impossible because it conflicts with the Debian
>> policy?
>> 
>> Thanks and all the best.
>> 
> 
> For what it's worth, various GNOME packages have received minor updates from
> upstream since the freeze:
> 
> [UPGRADE] gnome-settings-daemon:amd64 3.14.1-1 -> 3.14.2-1
> [UPGRADE] gnome-tweak-tool:amd64 3.14.0-1 -> 3.14.2-1
> [UPGRADE] gnome-accessibility-themes:amd64 3.14.0-1 -> 3.14.2.2-1
> [UPGRADE] gnome-shell-extensions:amd64 3.14.1-1 -> 3.14.2-1
> [UPGRADE] gnome-themes-standard:amd64 3.14.0-1 -> 3.14.2.2-1
> [UPGRADE] gnome-themes-standard-data:amd64 3.14.0-1 -> 3.14.2.2-1
> [UPGRADE] gnome-documents:amd64 3.14.1-1 -> 3.14.2-1
> [UPGRADE] gnome-shell:amd64 3.14.1-1 -> 3.14.2-1
> [UPGRADE] gnome-shell-common:amd64 3.14.1-1 -> 3.14.2-1
> [UPGRADE] gnome-control-center:amd64 1:3.14.1-1 -> 1:3.14.2-2
> [UPGRADE] gnome-control-center-data:amd64 1:3.14.1-1 -> 1:3.14.2-2
> 
> (taken from /var/log/aptitude)
> 
> So it can be done.

This seems to be similar to KDE updates to 4.14.3 which don't happen so far. Does this depend on the maintainer?

> 
> -- 
> 
> Liam
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] slrnm8ev3r.6k6.liam.p.otoole@dipsy.tubbynet">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] slrnm8ev3r.6k6.liam.p.otoole@dipsy.tubbynet
> 


Reply to: