Re: systemd-free alternatives are not off topic.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 24/11/2014 3:38 AM, John Hasler wrote:
> Andrew McGlashan writes:
>> I DO NOT WANT SYSTEMD ON ANY SYSTEM THAT I ADMINISTRATE ... is
>> that so hard to understand?
>
> What's hard to understand is why I should give a damn.
Ditto on why I should give a damn about your position.
I would like to see Debian move forward, but I see the systemd
situation as a clear backwards step.
The future of Debian will mean, as it stands today, that systemd will be
more important and likely become a necessity even though today "we are
not forced to use it" ... and that's just part of the problem.
I would prefer Linux kernel with traditional Debian userland with
stability and security as major focuses, not the init system or anything
else that comes along with systemd lock-in coming in the not too distant
future.
A.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
iF4EAREIAAYFAlRyLmwACgkQqBZry7fv4vutPAD/efPbFZzZNXR0oC3wTNIfCfG3
gt5ywQ30+S/gYyTosdkA/j4hEA0fD/aIn+/ypxUxh4QpciPe0ndIYYUpA71qa+LR
=QtTR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: