Re: umask has no man page?

[songbird <songbird@anthive.com>]

Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> songbird wrote:

>>   are you suggesting which be altered or the
>> manual page be amended to include more information
>> about what to do when which fails to report any
>> matching command?
>
> I'd rather see which(1) be more informative about built-ins.

  there's a lot of room for the octopus growing 
...  i.e. there are a large number of interpreted
languages and tools which have their own internal/
builtin commands (some using the same names as 
the binary versions e.g. apropos and gdb apropos).

  you might be more effective using a full man
page index of some sort and a more general search
tool.


  songbird