On Nov 8, 2014 12:24 PM, "Miles Fidelman" <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> wrote:
>
> Mart van de Wege wrote:
>>
>> Slavko <linux@slavino.sk> writes:
>>
>>> Ahoj,
>>>
>>> Dňa Sat, 08 Nov 2014 16:03:46 +0100 Mart van de Wege
>>> <mvdwege@gmail.com> napísal:
>>>
>>>> Why don't the anti-systemd people do what they've been threatening the
>>>> whole time and fuck off to another distro or to FreeBSD?
>>>
>>> This is exact example why i stopped all my contribution to Debian, and
>>> i will not start it again, despite if i stay with Debian in future or
>>> not! I orphan my packages in near future.
>>>
>>> If the community consider people which have another opinion as bad, it
>>> is time do not contribute to it more. And whole debate is about one
>>> idea: If you don't like systemd, you are stupid.
>>>
>> I consider people that bring nothing else but their opinion to the table
>> as lesser than people who do the actual development, yes. In this
>> discussion at least.
>>
>> If you can't even be bothered to set up a test server to look at
>> systemd, but instead foul up the mailing lists creating a climate where
>> threats to the actual developers become normal, then you can sod off. I
>> wouldn't trust you to sit the right way on a toilet seat.
>>
>
> So you're saying that reading specs, documentation, install reports, bug reports, q&a threads about specific problems, and so forth, are not useful ways to evaluate technology? Where I come from, that's called doing one's homework.
>
If that's suggesting those supplant actual testing..... If you're suggesting docs should be considered *as well*, absolutely.