Re: umask has no man page?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: umask has no man page?
From: Scott Ferguson <scott.ferguson.debian.user@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 14:17:37 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 5455A251.5080706@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87mw8as5es.fsf@thumper.dhh.gt.org>
References: <[🔎] 20141102021846.GA347@panix.com> <[🔎] 87mw8as5es.fsf@thumper.dhh.gt.org>

On 02/11/14 13:27, John Hasler wrote:
> An addition to the "See Also" section of the umask man page would
> suffice.
> 

Succinct!

man pam_umask?


Kind regards

--
"Turns out you can't back a winner in the Gish Gallop" ~ disappointed punter

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: umask has no man page?
  - From: Carl Fink <carl@finknetwork.com>

References:
- umask has no man page?
  - From: Carl Fink <carl@finknetwork.com>
- Re: umask has no man page?
  - From: John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com>

Prev by Date: Re: umask has no man page?
Next by Date: Re: Perfect Jessie is something like this...
Previous by thread: Re: umask has no man page?
Next by thread: Re: umask has no man page?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread