[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [exim4] mixed up about terminology



Jerry Stuckle <jstuckle@attglobal.net> writes:

> On 10/6/2014 7:10 PM, lee wrote:
>> Jerry Stuckle <jstuckle@attglobal.net> writes:
>> 
>>>>    dc_relay_nets
>>>>           A list of machines for which we serve as smarthost.
>>>>
>>>> That looks ideal, doesn't it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Right.  But he's not running multiple MTAs - he only has the one, as he
>>> already indicated.
>> 
>> Does it make a difference for this setting whether the MTA is smarthost
>> for other MTAs or for MUAs?
>> 
>> (I'm not using the automatic config other than to create a
>> "non-configured" exim which does nothing but use another host as
>> smarthost to deliver locally generated messages, so I don't know.)
>> 
>> 
>
> Yes, it does.  By definition, a smarthost talks to for other MTAs.  MUAs
> are not MTAs.

Ok, and what difference does this actually make?


-- 
Hallowed are the Debians!


Reply to: