Ahoj, Dňa Wed, 01 Oct 2014 18:00:39 +0200 Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> napísal: > On 2014-10-01 04:07 +0200, Rusi Mody wrote: > > > Yeah one more systemd thread [Not a rant!] > > > > I am getting that systemd-shim is to be removed. > > Is this expected? > > > > This is on testing running aptitude dist-upgrade. > > Unfortunately, testing does not currently have compatible versions of > systemd-shim and systemd. Which means that systemd-shim, although > installable, is useless. :-( > > > Dunno if this means anything: > > > > $ aptitude why-not systemd-shim > > i synaptic Recommends gksu | kdebase-bin | > > policykit-1 p policykit-1:i386 Provides > > policykit-1 p policykit-1:i386 Depends > > libpam-systemd:i386 p libpam-systemd:i386 Depends > > systemd-sysv:i386 | systemd-shim:i386 (>= 6-4) p > > systemd-shim:i386 Conflicts systemd-shim > > No, it's because systemd-shim Breaks: systemd (<< 209), but testing > has systemd 208-8. If you need systemd-shim (i.e. you're not using > systemd as PID 1), wait with the dist-upgrade until systemd 215 > migrates, which should happen in the next few days. And all these things are named as "systemd alternative" in Debian now and as argument that the systemd is not only one possible PID 1. regards -- Slavko http://slavino.sk
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature