Re: systemd and server use

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: systemd and server use
From: Steve Litt <slitt@troubleshooters.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:51:52 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20140928125152.0b1dc302@mydesq2.domain.cxm>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1578044.JzT1UzvYvB@merkaba>
References: <[🔎] 1653777367.1158204.1409689138690.JavaMail.zimbra@ptd.net> <[🔎] 20140926122630.36639841@mydesq2.domain.cxm> <[🔎] 54259C18.5090805@fastmail.fm> <[🔎] 1578044.JzT1UzvYvB@merkaba>

On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:09:48 +0200
Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de> wrote:


> As far as I remember Lennart or another systemd developers explained
> in detail why it was done this way, and that it can´t be done in any
> other way.

I'm especially fond of the "it's not unmodular, it's made from modules"
argument. Here's my take on that...

http://troubleshooters.com/linux/systemd/lol_systemd.htm

SteveT

Steve Litt                *  http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training  *  Human Performance

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: systemd and server use
  - From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
- Re: systemd and server use
  - From: Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org>

References:
- brasero requires gvfs
  - From: Rob Owens <rowens@ptd.net>
- Re: systemd and server use (was: Re: Challenge to you: Voice your concerns regarding systemd upstream)
  - From: Steve Litt <slitt@troubleshooters.com>
- Re: systemd and server use
  - From: The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm>
- Re: systemd and server use
  - From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Let's have a vote!
Next by Date: Re: Challenge to you: Voice your concerns regarding systemd upstream
Previous by thread: Re: systemd and server use
Next by thread: Re: systemd and server use
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread