Ahoj, Dňa Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:53:01 -0400 Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> napísal: > Martin Read wrote: > > On 26/09/14 16:09, Miles Fidelman wrote: > >> So let's see: > >> - the technical committee selects takes a vote that essentially > >> imposes systemd on all of the upstream developers and packagers > > > > The technical committee has no authority (and limited soft power) > > with respect to what *upstream* developers (i.e. the people who > > write the software that Debian members then choose to package for > > inclusion in Debian) do or don't do. It has bounded authority and > > power to decide what work is expected to be done or not done in > > Debian, and thus over what is provided *downstream* (i.e. to > > Debian's users). > > > > And a sizeable chunk of the upstream work for *compatibility with > > systemd* has already been done in response to events in Fedora, > > Arch, OpenSUSE, etc. At this point, it seems to me that any > > upstream who hasn't already done something to improve their > > software's compatibility with systemd (if it even needs any work to > > achieve such a thing) is more likely to say "bug reports only > > reproducible on systemd are your problem, not mine" than "oh, well, > > if Debian has gone with it as well maybe I'll have a look". > > And the next step is to stop paying attention to old style init > scripts. > Yes, then next step is go away from Debian. regards -- Slavko http://slavino.sk
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature