Re: systemd bug closed - next steps?
On Sun 21 Sep 2014 at 18:08:58 +0100, Martin Read wrote:
> As far as the Debian-related aspects of the matter are concerned, it
> seems to me that it would not be unreasonable to file bugs against
> sysvinit-core and upstart suggesting that they should have a
> Recommends: reference to systemd-shim.
A systemd-shim maintainer would disagree:
> In that case, perhaps the alternate init systems should Recommend
> systemd-shim?
No, that's not the true package relationship. There's no reason that you
should always get this added service by default when you install a system
with non-systemd init that doesn't need logind. Making this a recommends
would be a workaround for bad metadata in the libpam-systemd package; we
should fix that problem at its source the right way.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/09/msg00164.html
Reply to: