Re: embrace, extend, extinguish
Erwan David writes:
> Please read the article pointed by the OP.
I wrote:
> Nobody is going to impose any changes on the Debian packaging system.
> That's a nonstarter.
Erwan David writes:
> Even if in some later version systemd works only with this kind of
> scheme ?
Yes. Remember the LSB? What you suggest might actually be a good
thing. Debian would fork Systemd and then fix it, or else switch to
Upstart or something as a default.
And don't forget that Systemd is only the *default*. The best thing to
do at this point is to express strong interest in and support for
alternatives. File bugs and raise a stink whenever you find a package
that gratuitously requires Systemd. Offer patches when you can.
--
John Hasler
jhasler@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Reply to:
- References:
- embrace, extend, extinguish
- From: Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org>
- Re: embrace, extend, extinguish
- From: Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
- Re: embrace, extend, extinguish
- From: Steve Litt <slitt@troubleshooters.com>
- Re: embrace, extend, extinguish
- From: Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
- Re: embrace, extend, extinguish
- From: Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org>
- Re: embrace, extend, extinguish
- From: John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com>
- Re: embrace, extend, extinguish
- From: Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org>